Pragmatics & Cognition

522 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 522 papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 papers), Language and Linguistics (199 papers) and Philosophy (74 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (198 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (112 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pragmatics & Cognition are Kerstin Dautenhahn, Iain Werry, Ruth Wodak, Ray Jackendoff, Itiel E. Dror, Lambros Malafouris, Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, Tom Froese, Boris M. Velichkovsky and Tim Wharton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition.

Countries where authors publish in Pragmatics & Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pragmatics & Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pragmatics & Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pragmatics & Cognition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025