Anna Chapman

1.4k citations
59 papers · 949 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Chapman

49 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Anna Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 203
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 74
  • Public Administration 39
  • Pharmacy 41
  • General Health Professions 140
Replace Gail Bellamy with:
Gail Bellamy United States
Wichit Srisuphan Thailand
Marjorie K. Mau United States
Pey-Jiuan Lee United States
Carol Pierannunzi United States
Ingrid Ruud Knutsen Norway
Kasper Olesen Denmark
Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad Iran
Isabel Larrañaga Spain
Natalie Johnson Australia
Anna Chapman relative to Gail Bellamy United States Gail Bellamy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Gail Bellamy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Chapman. The network helps show where Anna Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Anna Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007202
2 2013151
3 201393
4 201075
5 201558
6 201649
7 200648
8 201637
9 201921
10 201817
11 201516
12 201615
13 200313
14 200612
15 201112
16 20089
17 20089
18 20259
19 20208
20 20207

About Anna Chapman

Anna Chapman is a scholar working on Public Administration, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (14 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (9 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (8 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (6 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (203 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (74 citations), Public Administration (39 citations), Pharmacy (41 citations) and General Health Professions (140 citations). Anna Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Danielle Mazza, Susan Michie, Colette Browning, Stephanie Merkouris, Sean Cowlishaw, Hui Yang, Shane Thomas, Tiina Laatikainen, Edward Janus and Annamari Kilkkinen. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, BMC Health Services Research, Frontiers in Public Health, BMC Public Health and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact