Anna C. Singleton

35 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Anna C. Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Family Practice 36
  • General Health Professions 139
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Oncology 95
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
Replace Devon H. Taylor with:
Devon H. Taylor United States
Claus Møldrup Denmark
Gaby Anne Wildenbos Netherlands
Yul Ha Min South Korea
Baria Hafeez United States
Jane M. Miles United States
Andrea Gentili Italy
Zsolt J. Nagykaldi United States
Maria Chang Swartz United States
H. Gene McFadden United States
Anna C. Singleton relative to Devon H. Taylor United States Devon H. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Devon H. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna C. Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna C. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna C. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna C. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna C. Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna C. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna C. Singleton. The network helps show where Anna C. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna C. Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna C. Singleton Line = papers co-authored together Anna C. Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020119
2 201884
3 202283
4 201930
5 202229
6 202126
7 202125
8 202024
9 202123
10 201921
11 202218
12 202015
13 202414
14 202114
15 201914
16 201914
17 201612
18 202111
19 202310
20 201910

About Anna C. Singleton

Anna C. Singleton is a scholar working on Oncology, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (36 citations), General Health Professions (139 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Oncology (95 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations). Anna C. Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Redfern, Stephanie Ruth Partridge, Rebecca Raeside, Karice Hyun, Clara Kayei Chow, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Kerry Anne Sherman, Si Si Jia, Karla Santo and Elisabeth Edström Elder. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMJ Open, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact