Anna A. Pendina

36 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Anna A. Pendina
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 92
  • Reproductive Medicine 82
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 124
  • Urology 25
  • Cancer Research 51
Replace Olga A. Efimova with:
Olga A. Efimova Russia
Feng-Tao Shi China
Stephanie Beall United States
Firouz Khamsi Canada
Jacqui Detmar Canada
Sophie Lorquet Belgium
I Rzepka-Górska Poland
Tae Kusabiraki Japan
Valerie Pestinger United Kingdom
Gözde Ünek Türkiye
Anna A. Pendina relative to Olga A. Efimova Russia Olga A. Efimova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Olga A. Efimova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna A. Pendina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna A. Pendina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna A. Pendina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna A. Pendina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna A. Pendina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna A. Pendina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna A. Pendina. The network helps show where Anna A. Pendina may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna A. Pendina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna A. Pendina Line = papers co-authored together Anna A. Pendina links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201955
2 201650
3 202034
4 201027
5 201726
6 201325
7 202324
8 201022
9 201421
10 201613
11 202312
12 201810
13 20178
14
[Peculiarities of metaphase chromosome methylation pattern in preimplantation human embryos].
20058
15 20197
16 20047
17
[Immunocytochemical analysis of human metaphase chromosome methylation status].
20057
18 20216
19 20156
20 20215

About Anna A. Pendina

Anna A. Pendina is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (16 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (15 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (6 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 citations), Reproductive Medicine (82 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (124 citations), Urology (25 citations) and Cancer Research (51 citations). Anna A. Pendina has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Olga A. Efimova, В. С. Баранов, Andrei V. Tikhonov, Irina Fedorova, Alexander M. Gzgzyan, Аndrey S. Glotov, Т. В. Кузнецова, Elena S. Vashukova, Pavel V. Fedotov and Igor Yu. Kogan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Genes, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact