Ann O’Doherty
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 14
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 13
- Co-authors
- Cecily Quinn (14 shared papers)Arnold Hill (7 shared papers)Mary F. Dillon (6 shared papers)N. J. O’Higgins (5 shared papers)Enda McDermott (10 shared papers)Fidelma Flanagan (7 shared papers)Niall Phelan (1 shared paper)Niamh Hambly (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Screening (4 papers)Annals of Surgical Oncology (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Pathology (2 papers)The Breast Journal (2 papers)Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ann O’Doherty
22 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cancer Research 336
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 381
- Dermatology 114
- Oncology 181
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 102
Countries citing papers authored by Ann O’Doherty
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann O’Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann O’Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann O’Doherty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann O’Doherty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann O’Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann O’Doherty. The network helps show where Ann O’Doherty may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann O’Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Ann O’Doherty
Ann O’Doherty is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology, Dermatology and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (14 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (336 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (381 citations), Dermatology (114 citations), Oncology (181 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (102 citations). Ann O’Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cecily Quinn, Arnold Hill, Mary F. Dillon, N. J. O’Higgins, Enda McDermott, Fidelma Flanagan, Niall Phelan, Niamh Hambly, M. McNicholas and Gormlaith Hargaden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Screening, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Pathology, The Breast Journal and Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.