Jane Rothwell
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 17
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 2
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 7
- Co-authors
- James Geraghty (24 shared papers)Denis Evoy (19 shared papers)R S Prichard (9 shared papers)E. McDermott (7 shared papers)Liam Devane (3 shared papers)Cecily Quinn (12 shared papers)Ruth Prichard (11 shared papers)Damian McCartan (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of Surgical Oncology (6 papers)The Breast Journal (4 papers)British journal of surgery (3 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Rothwell
23 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Cancer Research 220
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
- Oncology 68
- Surgery 65
- Dermatology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Rothwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Rothwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Rothwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Rothwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Rothwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Rothwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Rothwell. The network helps show where Jane Rothwell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Rothwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 110 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Jane Rothwell
Jane Rothwell is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Dermatology and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (17 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (220 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations), Oncology (68 citations), Surgery (65 citations) and Dermatology (9 citations). Jane Rothwell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Geraghty, Denis Evoy, R S Prichard, E. McDermott, Liam Devane, Cecily Quinn, Ruth Prichard, Damian McCartan, A. O’Doherty and Enda McDermott. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, The Breast Journal, British journal of surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.