Daniel E. Lehrer

5 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Lehrer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 499
  • Cancer Research 351
  • Dermatology 158
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 295
  • Artificial Intelligence 251
Replace Anna Linda with:
Anna Linda Italy
Ermelinda Bonaccio United States
Ann O’Doherty Ireland
Jocelyn A. Rapelyea United States
Volker Duda Germany
Yung‐Feng Lo Taiwan
Marina E. Giurescu United States
Jennifer B. Kaplan United States
L.J. Yeoman United Kingdom
G W Eklund United States
Daniel E. Lehrer relative to Anna Linda Italy Anna Linda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anna Linda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Lehrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Lehrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Lehrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Lehrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Lehrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Lehrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Lehrer. The network helps show where Daniel E. Lehrer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Lehrer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Lehrer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Lehrer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2001271
2 2015220
3 2009148
4 2002141
5
Reasons Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer Refuse Breast MR Imaging Screening
201012
6 20240

About Daniel E. Lehrer

Daniel E. Lehrer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (1 paper), Veterinary Oncology Research (1 paper) and Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (499 citations), Cancer Research (351 citations), Dermatology (158 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (295 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (251 citations). Daniel E. Lehrer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wendie A. Berg, Etta D. Pisano, Ellen B. Mendelson, Roberta A. Jong, Andriy I. Bandos, Roger J. Jackman, Steve H. Parker, Mary C. Lechner, W. Phil Evans and Fred Burbank. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, American Journal of Roentgenology and Journal of Breast Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact