Ann King

947 citations
18 papers · 650 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ann King

18 papers receiving 615 citations

Ann King's Hit Papers

“Best Practice” for Patient-Centered Communication: A Narrative Review 2013 · 396 citations
3960+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Ann King
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Family Practice 91
  • General Health Professions 323
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
  • Pharmacy 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
Replace William Strull with:
William Strull United States
Lonneke Bokken Netherlands
Nadia M. Bajwa Switzerland
Donald Brady United States
John Patrick T. Co United States
Gene Harkless United States
Kathy Cole‐Kelly United States
Charlene M. Dewey United States
Maryellen E. Gusic United States
Alicia D. Monroe United States
Ann King relative to William Strull United States William Strull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
William Strull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann King. The network helps show where Ann King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann King Line = papers co-authored together Ann King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
“Best Practice” for Patient-Centered Communication: A Narrative Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2013396
2 197778
3 201153
4 199438
5 200922
6 201320
7 20147
8 20187
9 20035
10 20215
11 19975
12 20223
13
The disruptive possibilities of looking in classrooms
20063
14 20222
15 20242
16 19912
17 20221
18 19751

About Ann King

Ann King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Pharmacy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (91 citations), General Health Professions (323 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (274 citations), Pharmacy (39 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations). Ann King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ruth B. Hoppe, S G Darke, W. K. Slack, Henry Pohl, Janet Mee, Mark R. Raymond, Steven A. Haist, Debra Hayes, Kathleen M. Mazor and C. Suzanne Lea. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Medical Education, Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, JAMA Network Open and System.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact