Ann Freeman

499 citations
9 papers · 294 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 1%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 1%
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 6
    • Classical Studies and Legal History 1
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 1
    • Medieval Literature and History 4
    • Byzantine Studies and History 2
Journals
Speculum (3 papers)Gesta (1 paper)Viator (1 paper)Oxford Art Online (1 paper)The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Ann Freeman

8 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Ann Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Classics 236
  • History 149
  • Anthropology 80
  • Archeology 56
  • Religious studies 19
Replace Hubert Mordek with:
Hubert Mordek Germany
Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
Celia Chazelle United States
Otto Demus
Helmut Beumann
A. C. Dionisotti United Kingdom
Henry Mayr‐Harting United Kingdom
Patrick Amory
Peter Classen Germany
John W. Nesbitt United States
Ann Freeman relative to Hubert Mordek Germany Hubert Mordek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Hubert Mordek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Freeman. The network helps show where Ann Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Ann Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Ann Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Ann Freeman

Ann Freeman is a scholar working on History, Classics, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (236 citations), History (149 citations), Anthropology (80 citations), Archeology (56 citations) and Religious studies (19 citations). Ann Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Meyvaert. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Gesta, Viator, Oxford Art Online and The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact