Ann C. Cotter

14 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Ann C. Cotter
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Rehabilitation 149
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 76
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 42
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 9
Replace Mark Sanderson with:
Mark Sanderson United Kingdom
Paulo Adriano Schwingel Brazil
Nicole Peters Canada
E Hamrin Sweden
Joshua Barrett United States
A. Lynn Millar United States
Julia Patrick Engkasan Malaysia
Ítalo Ribeiro Lemes Brazil
Hatsue Sakamoto Brazil
Judith M. van Velzen Netherlands
Ann C. Cotter relative to Mark Sanderson United Kingdom Mark Sanderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mark Sanderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann C. Cotter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann C. Cotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann C. Cotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann C. Cotter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann C. Cotter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann C. Cotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann C. Cotter. The network helps show where Ann C. Cotter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann C. Cotter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann C. Cotter Line = papers co-authored together Ann C. Cotter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke.
1993372
2 201849
3 200143
4 201320
5 200017
6 200215
7 201510
8 19956
9 20175
10 19995
11
The transition from hospital to long-term institutional care.
19984
12 20124
13 20141
14 20111
15 19991

About Ann C. Cotter

Ann C. Cotter is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (1 paper), Educational Assessment and Improvement (1 paper), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (149 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (42 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations). Ann C. Cotter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C V Granger, Byron B. Hamilton, Roger C. Fiedler, Samuel C. Shiflett, Nancy E. Schoenberger, Sangeetha Nayak, Robert J. Matheis, Steven Kirshblum, Eric Finkelstein and Ather Ali. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Human Resource Development Quarterly and Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact