Anmol Gupta

53 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Anmol Gupta
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 27
  • Surgery 117
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 36
Replace Catherine Sullivan with:
Catherine Sullivan United States
Syed Ather Hussain United States
Besham Kumar Pakistan
Rebecca A. Clark United States
Hüseyin Cengiz Türkiye
Sedat Yanturalı Türkiye
Reinhard Dortschy Germany
Richard Grossberg United States
Ahmed K. Mortagy Egypt
Guy‐Robert Auleley France
Anmol Gupta relative to Catherine Sullivan United States Catherine Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Catherine Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anmol Gupta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anmol Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anmol Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anmol Gupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anmol Gupta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anmol Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anmol Gupta. The network helps show where Anmol Gupta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anmol Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anmol Gupta Line = papers co-authored together Anmol Gupta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202056
2 199938
3 201534
4 201932
5 202125
6 201923
7 201922
8 201619
9 201818
10 201218
11 202017
12 201416
13 201512
14
Combating Iron Deficiency Anemia among School Going Adolescent Girls in a Hilly State of North India: Effectiveness of Intermittent Versus Daily Administration of Iron Folic Acid Tablets.
20149
15 20207
16 20147
17 20206
18 20186
19 20186
20 20205

About Anmol Gupta

Anmol Gupta is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 64 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (62 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (27 citations), Surgery (117 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (36 citations). Anmol Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph H. Schwab, Stuart H. Hershman, Anita Thakur, Thomas Cha, Harold A. Fogel, Christopher M. Bono, Deepak Sharma, Daniel G. Tobert, Andrew C. Hecht and Afshin E. Razi. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Global Spine Journal, The FASEB Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact