Anke Versluis

1.2k citations
47 papers · 702 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Versluis

43 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Anke Versluis
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Applied Psychology 128
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Health Information Management 28
  • General Health Professions 119
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Jessica Sousa with:
Jessica Sousa United States
Melanie T. Gentry United States
Thierry Provencher Canada
Pete Wegier Canada
Julie Hathaway United States
Mirela Habibović Netherlands
Andrew Berry United States
Lyndsay A. Nelson United States
David Gratzer Canada
Stephanie Heinemann Germany
Anke Versluis relative to Jessica Sousa United States Jessica Sousa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jessica Sousa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Versluis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Versluis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Versluis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Versluis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Versluis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Versluis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Versluis. The network helps show where Anke Versluis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke Versluis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Versluis Line = papers co-authored together Anke Versluis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016122
2 202183
3 202152
4 202239
5 201738
6 202036
7 201827
8 202126
9 201726
10 202023
11 202022
12 202021
13 201817
14 202016
15 202014
16 202213
17 202113
18 202112
19 202111
20 201710

About Anke Versluis

Anke Versluis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Health Information Management, Epidemiology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (128 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations), Health Information Management (28 citations), General Health Professions (119 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Anke Versluis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Niels H. Chavannes, J. F. Brosschot, Bart Verkuil, Esther Talboom-Kamp, Philip Spinhoven, Marise J. Kasteleyn, Jiska J Aardoom, Julian F. Thayer, Rianne van der Kleij and Wilco P. Achterberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, European Journal of General Practice, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Digital Health and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact