Anke Gerber

627 citations
25 papers · 223 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Gerber

24 papers receiving 209 citations

Peers

Anke Gerber
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Economics and Econometrics 141
  • Safety Research 30
  • Management Science and Operations Research 17
  • Industrial relations 1
Replace Guang‐Zhen Sun with:
Guang‐Zhen Sun Australia
Matteo Rizzolli Italy
Jon X. Eguia United States
Françoise Schoumaker United States
Laurent Mathevet United States
María Montero United Kingdom
Nizar Allouch United Kingdom
Vianney Dequiedt France
Simone Galperti United States
Axel Anderson United States
Anke Gerber relative to Guang‐Zhen Sun Australia Guang‐Zhen Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Guang‐Zhen Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Gerber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Gerber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Gerber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Gerber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Gerber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Gerber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Gerber. The network helps show where Anke Gerber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anke Gerber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Gerber Line = papers co-authored together Anke Gerber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200842
2 199826
3 200319
4 201316
5 200615
6 201014
7 201714
8 200610
9 20058
10 20037
11 20107
12 20006
13 20025
14 20055
15 20155
16
original papers: Coalition formation in general NTU games
20004
17 20124
18 20103
19 20173
20 20193

About Anke Gerber

Anke Gerber is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Finance, General Decision Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (16 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper) and Economic Policies and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Economics and Econometrics (141 citations), Safety Research (30 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (17 citations) and Industrial relations (1 citation). Anke Gerber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Philipp C. Wichardt, Salvador Barberà, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortı́n, Kirsten I. M. Rohde, Thorsten Upmann, Thorsten Hens, Bodo Vogt, Andreas Nicklisch and Stefan Voigt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Mathematical Social Sciences, Social Choice and Welfare, European Economic Review and Review of Economic Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact