Andrew T. Fields

1.6k citations
35 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew T. Fields

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Andrew T. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 437
  • Aquatic Science 218
  • Insect Science 190
  • Aging 19
  • Genetics 228
Replace M. Emília Santos with:
M. Emília Santos United Kingdom
Scott A. Pavey Canada
G. Kilias Greece
Richard E. Broughton United States
Lingbo Ma China
Nicholas Stiffler United States
Andrés Pérez‐Figueroa Spain
Anne C. Dalziel Canada
Jong S. Leong Canada
Mats E. Pettersson Sweden
Andrew T. Fields relative to M. Emília Santos United Kingdom M. Emília Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
M. Emília Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew T. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew T. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew T. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew T. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew T. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew T. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew T. Fields. The network helps show where Andrew T. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew T. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew T. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Andrew T. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011212
2 201594
3 201789
4 201289
5 201486
6 199385
7 201865
8 201759
9 202032
10 201532
11 201629
12 201324
13
The land Mollusca of Dominica (Lesser Antilles), with notes on some enigmatic or rare species
200920
14 202018
15 202117
16 202017
17 202017
18 200417
19 202313
20 202313

About Andrew T. Fields

Andrew T. Fields is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (16 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (14 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (2 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (437 citations), Aquatic Science (218 citations), Insect Science (190 citations), Aging (19 citations) and Genetics (228 citations). Andrew T. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Demian D. Chapman, Kevin A. Feldheim, Aaron M. Tarone, Stanley K. H. Shea, William R. Rice, Andrew D. Stewart, Thomas L. Turner, Debra L. Abercrombie, Diego Cardeñosa and Elizabeth A. Babcock. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Genetics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Ecology and Evolution, PLoS ONE and Animal Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact