Andreas Wunder

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Andreas Wunder
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Neurology 201
  • Biomaterials 261
  • Cancer Research 250
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 341
  • Oncology 286
Replace Nataliya Smith with:
Nataliya Smith United States
Yang Hu United States
Young Suk Yu South Korea
Ricardo F. Frausto United States
Yoshichika Yoshioka Japan
Jeeva Munasinghe United States
Catherine A. Foss United States
Deborah A. Fraser United States
Daniele Procissi United States
Louis A. Peña United States
Andreas Wunder relative to Nataliya Smith United States Nataliya Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Nataliya Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Wunder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Wunder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Wunder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Wunder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Wunder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Wunder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Wunder. The network helps show where Andreas Wunder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Wunder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Wunder Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Wunder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997266
2 2002199
3 2003186
4 2002159
5 2004135
6 2011116
7 199793
8 200886
9 199762
10 200961
11 200953
12 200348
13 201247
14 199943
15 200838
16 200537
17 201336
18 201134
19 199829
20 202119

About Andreas Wunder

Andreas Wunder is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (7 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (6 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (5 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (4 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (201 citations), Biomaterials (261 citations), Cancer Research (250 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (341 citations) and Oncology (286 citations). Andreas Wunder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G. Stehle, Hannsjörg Sinn, D. L. Heene, W. Maier‐Borst, Jan Klohs, G. Hartung, Ulf Müller‐Ladner, Ulrich Dirnagl, Regina Heidenreich and Mohammad Farhadi. Their work appears in journals such as Anti-Cancer Drugs, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, International Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact