Andreas Mattes

450 citations
13 papers · 365 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Mattes

12 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Andreas Mattes
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 147
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 24
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 142
  • Physiology 115
  • Aging 6
Replace Chen-Chun Ou with:
Chen-Chun Ou Taiwan
Tomáš Baka Slovakia
Xin‐Ai Song China
Anna Daffonchio Italy
B. Lemmer Germany
Nicole K. Littlejohn United States
Meerson Fz Slovakia
Motohisa Osaka Japan
Frederic Nduhirabandi South Africa
Mohamed A. Fouda Egypt
Andreas Mattes relative to Chen-Chun Ou Taiwan Chen-Chun Ou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chen-Chun Ou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Mattes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Mattes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Mattes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Mattes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Mattes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Mattes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Mattes. The network helps show where Andreas Mattes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Mattes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Mattes Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Mattes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1993154
2 199193
3 199435
4 199128
5 199321
6 201212
7 20129
8 20125
9 20134
10 20112
11 20111
12 19921
13 20090

About Andreas Mattes

Andreas Mattes is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (5 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (4 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (147 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (142 citations), Physiology (115 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Andreas Mattes has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Björn Lemmer, Detlev Ganten, M Böhm, Klaus K. Witte, Takeshi Makabe, Tilmann Ott, Rüdiger Schade, Markus Pfeffer, Giuseppe Fazio and Andreas Kyek. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research, Hypertension and Winter Simulation Conference.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact