Andreas D. Ebert

108 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Andreas D. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Reproductive Medicine 888
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 596
  • Oncology 375
  • Social Psychology 275
  • Cell Biology 209
Replace Christel Péqueux with:
Christel Péqueux Belgium
Jill Clayton‐Smith United Kingdom
Anne Hampton Australia
Garry L. Warne Australia
David J. Amor Australia
Ivo J.P. Arnhold Brazil
Thomas Eggermann Germany
M. Tauber France
Charmian A. Quigley United States
Penelope Feuillan United States
Andreas D. Ebert relative to Christel Péqueux Belgium Christel Péqueux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Christel Péqueux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas D. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas D. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas D. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas D. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas D. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas D. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas D. Ebert. The network helps show where Andreas D. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas D. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas D. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Andreas D. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013146
2 2002131
3 2000112
4 201398
5 200789
6
Elevated keratin 18 protein expression indicates a favorable prognosis in patients with breast cancer.
199684
7 200882
8 200179
9 201374
10 200570
11 201170
12 200569
13 202069
14 199967
15 200565
16 200565
17 201061
18 201058
19 201756
20 201156

About Andreas D. Ebert

Andreas D. Ebert is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, History and Oncology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (31 papers), Medical History and Research (13 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (9 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (7 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (5 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (888 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (596 citations), Oncology (375 citations), Social Psychology (275 citations) and Cell Biology (209 citations). Andreas D. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia Mechsner, Martin Brüne, David S. Salomon, Christian Wechselberger, Caterina Bianco, Christoph Loddenkemper, Julia Bartley, Marc‐Andreas Edel, Nadia Khan and Brenda Wallace‐Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology and Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact