Ananda Mukherjee

764 citations
24 papers · 541 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ananda Mukherjee

23 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Ananda Mukherjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Biomaterials 90
  • Materials Chemistry 196
  • Molecular Medicine 19
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 69
  • Microbiology 22
Replace Mickaël Claudel with:
Mickaël Claudel France
Neha Singh India
Zhichun Shen China
Leilei Guo China
Xun Liu China
Yun Lu China
Mike H. Pillukat Germany
Gülen Melike Demirbolat Türkiye
Dharanivasan Gunasekaran India
Ananda Mukherjee relative to Mickaël Claudel France Mickaël Claudel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Mickaël Claudel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ananda Mukherjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ananda Mukherjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ananda Mukherjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ananda Mukherjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ananda Mukherjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ananda Mukherjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ananda Mukherjee. The network helps show where Ananda Mukherjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ananda Mukherjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ananda Mukherjee Line = papers co-authored together Ananda Mukherjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007178
2 2013126
3 201246
4 201226
5 201223
6 201618
7 200617
8 200915
9 201811
10 201311
11 200911
12 201610
13 201410
14 20198
15 20117
16 20125
17 20224
18 20194
19 20203
20 20233

About Ananda Mukherjee

Ananda Mukherjee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cell Biology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 24 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (7 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (90 citations), Materials Chemistry (196 citations), Molecular Medicine (19 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (69 citations) and Microbiology (22 citations). Ananda Mukherjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Parimal Karmakar, Biswarup Saha, Jaydeep Bhattacharya, Anjan Kr. Dasgupta, Jyotirindra Maity, Dipranjan Laha, Aparna Laskar, Panchanan Pramanik, A. Pramanik and Debalina Bhattacharya. Their work appears in journals such as Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis, Journal of Cell Science, Scientific Reports, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis and Nanoscale Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact