Ana Sofia Cerdeira

2.7k citations
51 papers · 2.0k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ana Sofia Cerdeira

51 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Ana Sofia Cerdeira
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.4k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 585
  • Immunology 592
  • Cancer Research 128
  • Reproductive Medicine 60
Replace Keiichi Kumasawa with:
Keiichi Kumasawa Japan
James Roberts United States
Guido Menato Italy
Zhan Zhang China
Haruta Mogami Japan
İbrahim Bildirici Türkiye
Asmaa M. Ahmed Egypt
Jong Yun Hwang South Korea
Hung‐Sheng Chen Taiwan
Akiyo Sekimoto Japan
Ana Sofia Cerdeira relative to Keiichi Kumasawa Japan Keiichi Kumasawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Keiichi Kumasawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Sofia Cerdeira

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Sofia Cerdeira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Sofia Cerdeira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Sofia Cerdeira more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Sofia Cerdeira

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Sofia Cerdeira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Sofia Cerdeira. The network helps show where Ana Sofia Cerdeira may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Sofia Cerdeira, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Sofia Cerdeira Line = papers co-authored together Ana Sofia Cerdeira links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013162
2 2006157
3 2015150
4 2012144
5 2017130
6 2017127
7 2013124
8 2019103
9 2012100
10 201994
11 201985
12 201963
13 201757
14 201251
15 201446
16 201441
17 201937
18 201734
19 201929
20 201527

About Ana Sofia Cerdeira

Ana Sofia Cerdeira is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Immunology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (41 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (16 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (16 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (4 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.4k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (585 citations), Immunology (592 citations), Cancer Research (128 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (60 citations). Ana Sofia Cerdeira has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Ananth Karumanchi, Manu Vatish, Christopher W.G. Redman, Swati Agrawal, Tammy Hod, Ravi Thadhani, Adelino Leite‐Moreira, Carmen Brás‐Silva, Friedrich Brünner and Augustine Rajakumar. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, PLoS ONE, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, The FASEB Journal and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact