Ana Šimunić

18 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Ana Šimunić
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Clinical Psychology 27
  • General Health Professions 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 12
Replace Joana Neto with:
Joana Neto Portugal
Joyce Aguiar Portugal
M. Iida Japan
Nihan Albayrak‐Aydemir United Kingdom
Sabine Bährer‐Kohler Switzerland
El Hadj Touré Canada
Chua Bee Seok Malaysia
Henry Yeomans United Kingdom
Kathleen Vaughan Canada
Rebecca Kelly United States
Ana Šimunić relative to Joana Neto Portugal Joana Neto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Joana Neto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Šimunić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Šimunić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Šimunić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Šimunić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Šimunić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Šimunić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Šimunić. The network helps show where Ana Šimunić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ana Šimunić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Šimunić Line = papers co-authored together Ana Šimunić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201243
2 202028
3 201610
4 20238
5 20184
6 20233
7 20222
8 20232
9 20142
10 20231
11 20231
12 20161
13 19701
14 20141
15 20211
16
Skala za procjenu potencijalne darovitosti kod djece
20201
17
ATTITUDES TOWARD WORK AND THE ORGANIZATION IN THE CONTEXT OF A BONUS REWARD SYSTEM
20121
18
Skala konflikta radne i obiteljske uloge
20141
19 20240
20 20240

About Ana Šimunić

Ana Šimunić is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 23 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (2 citations), Clinical Psychology (27 citations), General Health Professions (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (15 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (12 citations). Ana Šimunić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Sabrina Cipolletta, Irena Knežević, Ivana Macuka, Ana Slišković, Ina Reić Ercegovac, Anita Frajman Ivković and Marija Ljubičić. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Child and Family Studies, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Drustvena istrazivanja and Revija za sociologiju.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact