Amy L. Mitchell
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Papers in
-
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 5
-
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 3
- Co-authors
- Dolores Albarracín (4 shared papers)Penny S. McNatt (2 shared papers)Cynthia T. F. Klein (2 shared papers)G. Tarcan Kumkale (2 shared papers)Moon‐Ho Ringo Ho (2 shared papers)Francisco García (5 shared papers)Marta R. Durantini (1 shared paper)Allison Earl (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Psychology (2 papers)Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (2 papers)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 paper)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)Behavioural Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Amy L. Mitchell
15 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Applied Psychology 66
- Epidemiology 203
- General Health Professions 136
- Communication 42
- General Decision Sciences 10
Countries citing papers authored by Amy L. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy L. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy L. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy L. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy L. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy L. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy L. Mitchell. The network helps show where Amy L. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy L. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 91 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 78 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 15 | Ethics and the Use of Animals in Art: How Art Can Progress the Discussion of Human-Animal Relations | 2016 | 1 |
About Amy L. Mitchell
Amy L. Mitchell is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (66 citations), Epidemiology (203 citations), General Health Professions (136 citations), Communication (42 citations) and General Decision Sciences (10 citations). Amy L. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Dolores Albarracín, Penny S. McNatt, Cynthia T. F. Klein, G. Tarcan Kumkale, Moon‐Ho Ringo Ho, Francisco García, Marta R. Durantini, Allison Earl, Mark H. Einstein and Stephen Day. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Clinical Cancer Research and Behavioural Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.