Amy Estes

534 citations
22 papers · 332 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Estes

20 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Amy Estes
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Ophthalmology 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 195
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 112
  • Pharmaceutical Science 5
  • Hematology 7
Replace Akhee Sarker‐Nag with:
Akhee Sarker‐Nag United States
John Bush Japan
Sonia Phulke India
Anuprita Ghosh India
Julián García Sánchez Spain
S. Scheer France
Danielle N. Meadows United States
Jose A. Pitarque Poland
JA ELDRED United Kingdom
L. Motterle Italy
Amy Estes relative to Akhee Sarker‐Nag United States Akhee Sarker‐Nag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Akhee Sarker‐Nag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Estes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Estes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Estes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Estes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Estes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Estes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Estes. The network helps show where Amy Estes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Estes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Estes Line = papers co-authored together Amy Estes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017108
2 201856
3 202226
4 202026
5 202215
6 202113
7 202013
8 202012
9 202111
10 20239
11 20168
12 20237
13 20216
14 20236
15 20245
16 20114
17 20242
18
The abundance of Serine Protease Inhibitors in Human Aqueous Humor and Race and Gender-Specific Alterations in Glaucoma Patients
20212
19 20242
20 20241

About Amy Estes

Amy Estes is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper) and Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (85 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (195 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (112 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (5 citations) and Hematology (7 citations). Amy Estes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yutao Liu, Michelle Drewry, Inas Helwa, Mariam Lotfy Khaled, Mutsa Seremwe, Shruti Sharma, Wenbo Zhi, Tae Jin Lee, Ashok Sharma and David Bogorad. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Personalized Medicine, The Ocular Surface and BioMed Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact