Amy E. Williams

46 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Amy E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 340
  • Physiology 421
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 229
  • Pharmacology 259
  • Gastroenterology 63
Replace Susanna Bantick with:
Susanna Bantick United Kingdom
Y. Sosa United States
Katherine T. Martucci United States
Rea Rodriguez‐Raecke Germany
Michael L. Keaser United States
Alyssa Lebel United States
Regine Klinger Germany
Chia‐Shu Lin Taiwan
André P. Mauderli United States
Christian Sprenger Germany
Amy E. Williams relative to Susanna Bantick United Kingdom Susanna Bantick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Susanna Bantick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Williams. The network helps show where Amy E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005177
2 2007146
3 200695
4 200591
5 201680
6 201167
7 200662
8 201346
9 200945
10 200744
11 200938
12 200637
13 201033
14 200933
15 201032
16 200429
17 201928
18 200625
19 201523
20 201222

About Amy E. Williams

Amy E. Williams is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (4 papers) and Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (340 citations), Physiology (421 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (229 citations), Pharmacology (259 citations) and Gastroenterology (63 citations). Amy E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jamie L. Rhudy, Klanci M. McCabe, Jennifer Russell, Philip L. Rambo, Emily J. Bartley, William G. Kronenberger, Danita I. Czyzewski, Robert J. Shulman, David Dunn and Mariella M. Self. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Pain, Pain Medicine, International Journal of Psychophysiology and Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact