Amos Perlmutter

1.2k citations
59 papers · 661 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Amos Perlmutter

48 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Amos Perlmutter
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 405
  • Sociology and Political Science 445
  • History 46
  • Anthropology 42
  • Development 15
Replace Avi Shlaim with:
Avi Shlaim United Kingdom
Michael H. Hunt United States
Frank O’Gorman United Kingdom
Alexander J. Motyl United States
George C. Herring United States
Richard H. Immerman United States
Robert L. Hardgrave United States
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick United States
Warren I. Cohen United States
B. D. Graham United Kingdom
Amos Perlmutter relative to Avi Shlaim United Kingdom Avi Shlaim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Avi Shlaim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amos Perlmutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amos Perlmutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amos Perlmutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amos Perlmutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amos Perlmutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amos Perlmutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amos Perlmutter. The network helps show where Amos Perlmutter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Amos Perlmutter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amos Perlmutter Line = papers co-authored together Amos Perlmutter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197887
2 198267
3 197858
4 196941
5 198340
6
Egypt: The Praetorian State
197426
7 197423
8 197023
9 196718
10 198318
11 197018
12 198717
13 199817
14 198216
15 198214
16 200414
17 198214
18 198013
19 196910
20 196810

About Amos Perlmutter

Amos Perlmutter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, History and Anthropology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (21 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (9 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (6 papers), Military History and Strategy (5 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (4 papers), Military and Defense Studies (4 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (405 citations), Sociology and Political Science (445 citations), History (46 citations), Anthropology (42 citations) and Development (15 citations). Amos Perlmutter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William M. LeoGrande, Peter Paret, Michael Kent Curtis, Gerald E. Caiden, Ted Galen Carpenter, Edwin A. Winckler, Ilan Peleg, John C. Campbell, Michael I. Handel and William Gutteridge. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review, World Politics, Middle Eastern Studies and Journal of Strategic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact