Amit Kumar Paul

1.2k citations
71 papers · 993 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Amit Kumar Paul

66 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Amit Kumar Paul
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Spectroscopy 347
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 497
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 109
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
  • Bioengineering 44
Replace Tamás Grósz with:
Tamás Grósz Hungary
R. D. Knight United States
Angela Perry United States
Ljiljana Kolar-Anić Serbia
François G. Amar United States
Boyd L. Earl United States
John M. Price United States
Martin Schwartz United States
P. Raghunathan India
Amit Kumar Paul relative to Tamás Grósz Hungary Tamás Grósz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Tamás Grósz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit Kumar Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Kumar Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Kumar Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Kumar Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Kumar Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Kumar Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Kumar Paul. The network helps show where Amit Kumar Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit Kumar Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit Kumar Paul Line = papers co-authored together Amit Kumar Paul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007145
2 201358
3 200941
4 201439
5 201435
6 201134
7 201134
8 200930
9 201430
10 201628
11 200528
12 201527
13 201526
14 200825
15 201825
16 201523
17 201519
18 201019
19 202119
20 201318

About Amit Kumar Paul

Amit Kumar Paul is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 71 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (34 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (24 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (11 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (8 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (6 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (6 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (347 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (497 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations) and Bioengineering (44 citations). Amit Kumar Paul has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Satrajit Adhikari, William L. Hase, Matthew Rizzo, Jon Tippin, Soma Mukherjee, Linda Ng Boyle, Subhankar Sardar, H. Stoeckli‐Evans, Saikat Mukherjee and Biplab Sarkar. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Sensors and Actuators B Chemical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact