Amit Kar
Impact in
-
- Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
- Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Pharmacology top 2%
Papers in
-
- Agricultural Economics and Practices 29
-
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Pulok K. Mukherjee (59 shared papers)Subhadip Banerjee (16 shared papers)Joydeb Chanda (15 shared papers)Sayan Biswas (15 shared papers)Shiv Bahadur (12 shared papers)Pulok K. Mukherjee (7 shared papers)Ranjit K. Harwansh (8 shared papers)Nanaocha Sharma (24 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (11 papers)Phytochemical Analysis (6 papers)Phytomedicine (4 papers)Fitoterapia (2 papers)Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaThailandSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Amit Kar
110 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Complementary and alternative medicine 344
- Pharmacology 189
- Biochemistry 128
- Food Science 174
- Plant Science 354
Countries citing papers authored by Amit Kar
This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Kar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Kar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Kar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Kar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Kar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Kar. The network helps show where Amit Kar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit Kar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 101 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 20 |
About Amit Kar
Amit Kar is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine, Food Science and Pharmacology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Practices (29 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (10 papers), Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (9 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (7 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (7 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (7 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (7 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (344 citations), Pharmacology (189 citations), Biochemistry (128 citations), Food Science (174 citations) and Plant Science (354 citations). Amit Kar has collaborated with scholars based in India, Thailand and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Pulok K. Mukherjee, Subhadip Banerjee, Joydeb Chanda, Sayan Biswas, Shiv Bahadur, Pulok K. Mukherjee, Ranjit K. Harwansh, Nanaocha Sharma, C.K. Katiyar and Bhaskar Das. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemical Analysis, Phytomedicine, Fitoterapia and Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.