Amit Bajaj

434 citations
11 papers · 313 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Amit Bajaj

10 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Amit Bajaj
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 200
  • Clinical Psychology 103
  • Education 146
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 35
Replace Jae H. Paik with:
Jae H. Paik United States
Piret Soodla Estonia
Laura Lami Italy
Erica M. Barnes United States
Shurita Thomas-Tate United States
Heather Douglas Canada
Barbara J. Wendling United States
James Christie United States
Jane Fleming United States
Emily A. Diehm United States
Amit Bajaj relative to Jae H. Paik United States Jae H. Paik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jae H. Paik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit Bajaj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Bajaj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Bajaj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Bajaj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Bajaj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Bajaj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Bajaj. The network helps show where Amit Bajaj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Amit Bajaj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit Bajaj Line = papers co-authored together Amit Bajaj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1997169
2 200768
3 200421
4 200514
5
Effect of volatile fatty acids on embryogenesis and hatching of Meloidogyne incognita eggs
200310
6 20079
7 20238
8 19977
9 20114
10
Tpm Implementation In Small Scale Agriculture Industry: A Case Study
20133
11 20240

About Amit Bajaj

Amit Bajaj is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Plant Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Soil Science and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stuttering Research and Treatment (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (2 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (2 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (1 paper) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (200 citations), Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Education (146 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (35 citations). Amit Bajaj has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Marlene Schommer, Barbara Williams Hodson, Marlene Schommer‐Aikins, Carol Westby, Ruchi Bansal, Manpreet Singh Mavi, Vipan Kumar, Christina Zaleski, Joseph R. Cava and Peter C. Dyke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluency Disorders, Journal of Educational Psychology, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Scientia Horticulturae and Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact