Amine Chellali

47 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Amine Chellali
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Human-Computer Interaction 231
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 158
  • Surgery 205
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Emergency Medical Services 25
Replace Alan J. Lomax with:
Alan J. Lomax Canada
Álvaro Uribe-Quevedo Canada
Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen Denmark
Gerald R. Moses United States
Anna D. Skinner United States
Timothy R. Coles United Kingdom
Geoffrey Tien Canada
Georg Regal Austria
Julian Abich United States
Barbara Frank Germany
Amine Chellali relative to Alan J. Lomax Canada Alan J. Lomax's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Alan J. Lomax · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amine Chellali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amine Chellali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amine Chellali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amine Chellali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amine Chellali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amine Chellali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amine Chellali. The network helps show where Amine Chellali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amine Chellali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amine Chellali Line = papers co-authored together Amine Chellali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015104
2 202046
3 201438
4 201132
5 201231
6 201230
7 201430
8 201628
9 201227
10 201223
11 202122
12 201520
13 201718
14 201417
15 202016
16 201415
17 201514
18
WYFIWIF: A Haptic Communication Paradigm For Collaborative Motor Skills Learning
201012
19 201510
20 20159

About Amine Chellali

Amine Chellali is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 51 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (22 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (18 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (18 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (16 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (231 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (158 citations), Surgery (205 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (25 citations). Amine Chellali has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Caroline G. L. Cao, Cédric Dumas, Steven D. Schwaitzberg, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Helena M. Mentis, Samir Otmane, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Suvranu De, Daniel B. Jones and Woo Jin Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Computers & Graphics, Virtual Reality, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact