Ami Tint

1.5k citations
37 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ami Tint

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ami Tint
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Clinical Psychology 640
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 543
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 208
  • Speech and Hearing 82
  • Safety Research 95
Replace Sarah Dababnah with:
Sarah Dababnah United States
Johanna Lake Canada
Elspeth Bradley Canada
Rachel Haine‐Schlagel United States
Barry Ingham United Kingdom
Susanne Olsen Roper United States
Susana Gavidia‐Payne Australia
Mary J. Baker-Ericzén United States
Ashley C. Woodman United States
Verity Chester United Kingdom
Ami Tint relative to Sarah Dababnah United States Sarah Dababnah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sarah Dababnah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Tint

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Tint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Tint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Tint more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Tint

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Tint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Tint. The network helps show where Ami Tint may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ami Tint, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ami Tint Line = papers co-authored together Ami Tint links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013118
2 2016111
3 2017103
4 201590
5 201756
6 201551
7 201649
8 201545
9 201442
10 201641
11 201740
12 202034
13 202033
14 201429
15 200829
16 201627
17 201820
18 201918
19 202218
20 202118

About Ami Tint

Ami Tint is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (22 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (17 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (640 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (543 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations), Speech and Hearing (82 citations) and Safety Research (95 citations). Ami Tint has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Weiss, Yona Lunsky, Suzanne Robinson, Vanessa M. Vogan, Johanna Lake, Stephanie Fung, Anna M. Palucka, Elspeth Bradley, Kendra Thomson and Melissa Paquette‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Autism, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Autism Research, Disability and health journal and Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact