Ames Dhai

80 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Ames Dhai
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • General Health Professions 134
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 137
  • Health 39
  • Pharmacy 17
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 34
Replace Gil Siegal with:
Gil Siegal Israel
Yan Kwan Lau United States
Jennifer Richmond United States
Cláudia de Freitas Portugal
David Ansell United States
Sabrina Ford United States
Laura Mkumba United States
Eileen O’Keefe United Kingdom
Wenchi Liang United States
Whitney M. Randolph United States
Ames Dhai relative to Gil Siegal Israel Gil Siegal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Gil Siegal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ames Dhai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ames Dhai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ames Dhai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ames Dhai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ames Dhai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ames Dhai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ames Dhai. The network helps show where Ames Dhai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ames Dhai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ames Dhai Line = papers co-authored together Ames Dhai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201329
2 202228
3 200524
4 201421
5 201316
6 200815
7 201214
8 201612
9 201910
10
Confidentiality--a dying wish?
200110
11 20119
12 20199
13 20109
14 20189
15 20139
16 20148
17 20128
18 20138
19 20227
20 20127

About Ames Dhai

Ames Dhai is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Law, having authored 86 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (16 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (14 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (12 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (10 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers) and Human Rights and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (134 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (137 citations), Health (39 citations), Pharmacy (17 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (34 citations). Ames Dhai has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jagidesa Moodley, Lawrence O. Gostin, Eric Friedman, R. Wiersma, Christoffel Grobler, Eleanor Ross, Harriet Etheredge, David McQuoid–Mason, Martin Veller and Attiya Waris. Their work appears in journals such as South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, Developing World Bioethics, South African Medical Journal, South African Journal of Science and Journal of Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact