Amelie Lupp

147 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Amelie Lupp
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Hepatology 295
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 699
  • Neurology 418
  • Oncology 748
  • Epidemiology 924
Replace Susana Solá with:
Susana Solá Portugal
Takayuki Yamamoto Japan
Ping Wei China
Sharon DeMorrow United States
Joaquı́n Arenas Spain
Fumio Endo Japan
Toshihiro Okamoto Japan
Liying Li China
Masataka Majima Japan
Davide D’Amico Italy
Amelie Lupp relative to Susana Solá Portugal Susana Solá's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Susana Solá · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amelie Lupp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelie Lupp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelie Lupp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelie Lupp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelie Lupp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelie Lupp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelie Lupp. The network helps show where Amelie Lupp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amelie Lupp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amelie Lupp Line = papers co-authored together Amelie Lupp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017238
2 2015208
3 2018188
4 2016158
5 2012148
6 1987139
7 2015135
8 2020134
9
Comparing of IRS and Her2 as immunohistochemical scoring schemes in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
2012118
10 2011118
11 2012115
12 201784
13 201584
14 200580
15 201080
16 199276
17 201271
18 198869
19 201169
20 200766

About Amelie Lupp

Amelie Lupp is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 149 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (27 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (21 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (17 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (12 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (10 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (295 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (699 citations), Neurology (418 citations), Oncology (748 citations) and Epidemiology (924 citations). Amelie Lupp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Schulz, Daniel Kaemmerer, Jörg Sänger, Georg Hertting, David Dooley, Thomas J. Feuerstein, Ralph M. Wirtz, Merten Hommann, G. Hertting and Richard P. Baum. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact