Amel Becirevic

13 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Amel Becirevic
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 98
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 66
  • Clinical Psychology 52
Replace Amy J. Henley with:
Amy J. Henley United States
Byron Wine United States
Sara O’Donnell United States
Karolin Gieseler Germany
Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti Brazil
Ricardo M. Tamayo Colombia
Nils-Torge Telle Germany
Alex C. Huynh Canada
Jozef Bavoľár Slovakia
Deanna C. Whelan Canada
Amel Becirevic relative to Amy J. Henley United States Amy J. Henley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Amy J. Henley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amel Becirevic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amel Becirevic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amel Becirevic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amel Becirevic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amel Becirevic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amel Becirevic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amel Becirevic. The network helps show where Amel Becirevic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Amel Becirevic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amel Becirevic Line = papers co-authored together Amel Becirevic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201744
2 201642
3 201641
4 201625
5 201714
6 20179
7 20177
8 20166
9 20186
10 20195
11 20164
12 20143
13 20141

About Amel Becirevic

Amel Becirevic is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Dermatology, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 13 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (98 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (66 citations) and Clinical Psychology (52 citations). Amel Becirevic has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Derek D. Reed, Thomas S. Critchfield, Brent A. Kaplan, Peter G. Roma, Steven R. Hursh, Karla J. Doepke, Daniel M. Fienup, Bruce S. Liese, Paul Atchley and Michael Amlung. Their work appears in journals such as The Psychological Record, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, The Behavior Analyst and Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact