Amber Khan
Impact in
- Food Science top 1%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
-
- Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Papers in
- Food Science 14
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 13
-
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 11
- Co-authors
- Aijaz Ahmad (21 shared papers)Nikhat Manzoor (17 shared papers)Luqman Ahmad Khan (12 shared papers)Feroz Akhtar (2 shared papers)Immaculata Xess (2 shared papers)Mohmmad Younus Wani (2 shared papers)Waseem A. Wani (1 shared paper)Ashanul Haque (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Microbial Pathogenesis (3 papers)Canadian Journal of Microbiology (2 papers)Clinical Immunology (2 papers)Research in Microbiology (2 papers)Medical Mycology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amber Khan
32 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Food Science 647
- Complementary and alternative medicine 215
- Infectious Diseases 345
- Pharmacology 128
- Plant Science 453
Countries citing papers authored by Amber Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Khan. The network helps show where Amber Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 196 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 112 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 107 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 103 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 96 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 95 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 15 |
About Amber Khan
Amber Khan is a scholar working on Food Science, Infectious Diseases, Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (11 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (4 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (3 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (3 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (2 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (647 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (215 citations), Infectious Diseases (345 citations), Pharmacology (128 citations) and Plant Science (453 citations). Amber Khan has collaborated with scholars based in India, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aijaz Ahmad, Nikhat Manzoor, Luqman Ahmad Khan, Feroz Akhtar, Immaculata Xess, Mohmmad Younus Wani, Waseem A. Wani, Ashanul Haque, Imran Ali and Kishwar Saleem. Their work appears in journals such as Microbial Pathogenesis, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Clinical Immunology, Research in Microbiology and Medical Mycology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.