Amber Howell
Impact in
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 2
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Tyler A. Lesh (3 shared papers)J. Daniel Ragland (3 shared papers)Huan Wang (1 shared paper)Tara A. Niendam (2 shared papers)Cameron S. Carter (1 shared paper)Cameron S. Carter (2 shared papers)Alan Anticevic (2 shared papers)Richard J. Maddock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- NeuroImage Clinical (1 paper)Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)Communications Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amber Howell
8 papers receiving 181 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Biological Psychiatry 16
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 26
- Psychiatry and Mental health 27
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Amber Howell
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Howell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Howell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Howell. The network helps show where Amber Howell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 2 |
About Amber Howell
Amber Howell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (26 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (27 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (25 citations). Amber Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tyler A. Lesh, J. Daniel Ragland, Huan Wang, Tara A. Niendam, Cameron S. Carter, Cameron S. Carter, Alan Anticevic, Richard J. Maddock, Costin Tanase and Kimberly L. Ray. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage Clinical, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Psychiatry and Communications Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.