Amanda Vandyk

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Amanda Vandyk
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Research and Theory 47
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 16
  • Leadership and Management 14
  • Emergency Medicine 90
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 51
Replace Janet M. Coffman with:
Janet M. Coffman United States
Christina Foss Norway
Yow‐Wu B. Wu United States
Heidarali Abedi Iran
Barbro Wadensten Sweden
Milko Zanini Italy
Febe Friberg Norway
Rebekkah Middleton Australia
Masoud Bahrami Iran
Jacqueline McCallum United Kingdom
Amanda Vandyk relative to Janet M. Coffman United States Janet M. Coffman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet M. Coffman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Vandyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Vandyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Vandyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Vandyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Vandyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Vandyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Vandyk. The network helps show where Amanda Vandyk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Vandyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Vandyk Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Vandyk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012168
2 2018104
3 201381
4 201763
5 201758
6 201757
7 201748
8 201346
9 201941
10 201841
11 202036
12 201736
13 201229
14 202128
15 201124
16 202221
17 201417
18 202117
19 202016
20 202015

About Amanda Vandyk

Amanda Vandyk is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Research and Theory, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Social Media in Health Education (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (47 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (16 citations), Leadership and Management (14 citations), Emergency Medicine (90 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (51 citations). Amanda Vandyk has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret B. Harrison, Ian D. Graham, Amanda Ross‐White, Janet E. Squires, Jean Daniel Jacob, Dawn Stacey, Gail Macartney, Wendy Gifford, Yehudis Stokes and Lisa Young. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Systematic Reviews and International Journal of Health Policy and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact