Amanda Smith

7 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Amanda Smith's Hit Papers

Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease 2023 · 1.7k citations
1.7k0+1+3Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Amanda Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 542
  • Biological Psychiatry 78
  • Physiology 630
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 44
  • Neurology 163
Replace Michael L. Spinner with:
Michael L. Spinner United States
Hiroyuki Fukase Japan
Carme Deulofeu Spain
Meenakshi Patel United States
Giulia Bivona Italy
Wenbo He China
Ricardo Ayala United States
Margaret Rhee United States
Bruce J. Brew Australia
Marshall Nash United States
Amanda Smith relative to Michael L. Spinner United States Michael L. Spinner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.6×
Michael L. Spinner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Smith. The network helps show where Amanda Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Smith Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease
Hit paper breakdown →
20231732
2
Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2021403
3 201925
4 202019
5 202016
6 20229
7 20235
8 20220
9 20080

About Amanda Smith

Amanda Smith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (1 paper), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (1 paper), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (1 paper) and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (542 citations), Biological Psychiatry (78 citations), Physiology (630 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (44 citations) and Neurology (163 citations). Amanda Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Lauck, Marian Hawkey, Leslie Achtem, John G. Webb, Janarthanan Sathananthan, David Alexander Wood, Drew N. Rutherford, Thomas Gus Almonroeder, Michael Schiller and Thomas W. Kernozek. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, The Journal of Arthroplasty, JAMA, Clinical Biomechanics and Harm Reduction Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact