Amanda Rush

23 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Amanda Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 170
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 24
  • Cancer Research 56
  • Physiology 83
Replace Nicole C. Lockhart with:
Nicole C. Lockhart United States
Martina Loibner Austria
Carol J. Weil United States
Karen Bartley United States
Giulia Courthod Italy
Lala Tanmoy Das United States
Jilles M. Fermont United Kingdom
Azim Mehrvar Iran
Margaret Cupit-Link United States
Alexandre Lafourcade France
Amanda Rush relative to Nicole C. Lockhart United States Nicole C. Lockhart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Nicole C. Lockhart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Rush. The network helps show where Amanda Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Rush Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201889
2 201340
3 202030
4 201827
5 201518
6 201116
7 201914
8 201512
9 201511
10 202111
11 201710
12 20179
13 20247
14 20177
15 20156
16 20214
17 20244
18 20213
19 20212
20 20182

About Amanda Rush

Amanda Rush is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (17 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Research Data Management Practices (3 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (170 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (24 citations), Cancer Research (56 citations) and Physiology (83 citations). Amanda Rush has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer A. Byrne, Peter H. Watson, Patrick Breheny, Daniel Catchpoole, Jonas J. Astrin, Lori Campbell, Yvonne DeSouza, Ashokkumar A. Patel, Rod Ling and Andrew Searles. Their work appears in journals such as Biopreservation and Biobanking, Human Gene Therapy, The Journal of Pediatrics, Biophysical Reviews and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact