Amanda Reed
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Developmental Biology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 3
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 1
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 1
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 1
- Co-authors
- Michael P. Kilgard (5 shared papers)Vikram Jakkamsetti (3 shared papers)Ryan S. Carraway (2 shared papers)Claudia Perez (2 shared papers)Jonathan Riley (1 shared paper)Andrés E. Carrasco (1 shared paper)Crystal T. Engineer (4 shared papers)Kevin Chang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuroscience (2 papers)Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)Ear and Hearing (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Communication Research Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amanda Reed
6 papers receiving 394 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cognitive Neuroscience 357
- Developmental Biology 28
- Sensory Systems 48
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
- Neurology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Reed. The network helps show where Amanda Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 180 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 165 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Amanda Reed
Amanda Reed is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (357 citations), Developmental Biology (28 citations), Sensory Systems (48 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (102 citations) and Neurology (43 citations). Amanda Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Kilgard, Vikram Jakkamsetti, Ryan S. Carraway, Claudia Perez, Jonathan Riley, Andrés E. Carrasco, Crystal T. Engineer, Kevin Chang, Tracy M. Centanni and Pritesh K. Pandya. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Ear and Hearing, Neuron and Communication Research Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.