Amanda Potts

574 citations
17 papers · 330 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Potts

17 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Amanda Potts
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Communication 84
  • Literature and Literary Theory 73
  • Linguistics and Language 28
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Language and Linguistics 46
Replace Dawn Shepherd with:
Dawn Shepherd United States
Heidi Huntington United States
John S. Knox Australia
Laurie A. Henry United States
Michel Marcoccia France
S. Michael Putman United States
Christina Olin‐Scheller Sweden
Senad Bećirović Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cathy Ka Weng Hoi Macao
Katarzyna Molek‐Kozakowska Poland
Amanda Potts relative to Dawn Shepherd United States Dawn Shepherd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Dawn Shepherd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Potts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Potts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Potts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Potts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Potts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Potts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Potts. The network helps show where Amanda Potts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Potts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Potts Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Potts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201384
2 201553
3 201237
4 201429
5 201928
6 201423
7 201517
8 201714
9 201714
10 201513
11 20207
12 20236
13 20211
14 20211
15
AraSAS : a semantic tagger for Arabic
20131
16
London 2012 Games Media Impact Study
20131
17
London 2012 media impact study : Report for the Department for Culture Media and Sport
20131

About Amanda Potts

Amanda Potts is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Communication, Gender Studies and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (84 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations), Linguistics and Language (28 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations) and Language and Linguistics (46 citations). Amanda Potts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Baker, Elena Semino, Monika Bednarek, Helen Caple, Will Simm, Jon Whittle, Johann Wolfgang Unger, Paul Rayson, Tony McEnery and Richard Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Discourse Studies, Discourse & Communication, Discourse & Society, Discourse Context & Media and Metaphor and Symbol.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact