Amanda P. Moore

26 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Amanda P. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 128
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 53
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
  • Epidemiology 82
  • Surgery 98
Replace Girish Rayanagoudar with:
Girish Rayanagoudar United Kingdom
Ayae Yamamoto United States
Natalie A. Cameron United States
Benja Muktabhant Thailand
Anne B. Belton Belgium
Cong Luat Nguyen Australia
Kyle L. Thompson United States
Deirdre Ellen Murray Netherlands
Katie Suriano United Kingdom
O Valente Brazil
Amanda P. Moore relative to Girish Rayanagoudar United Kingdom Girish Rayanagoudar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Girish Rayanagoudar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda P. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda P. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda P. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda P. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda P. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda P. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda P. Moore. The network helps show where Amanda P. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda P. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda P. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Amanda P. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019139
2 201566
3 201245
4 201935
5 201927
6 201222
7 202022
8 202120
9 202114
10 201913
11 201613
12 200513
13 201713
14 20218
15 20165
16 20135
17 20175
18 20223
19 20202
20 20192

About Amanda P. Moore

Amanda P. Moore is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (128 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (53 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (76 citations), Epidemiology (82 citations) and Surgery (98 citations). Amanda P. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Goff Louise, Carol A. Rivas, Seeromanie Harding, Peter J. Milligan, Shakila Thangaratinam, Bassel H. Al Wattar, Lee Beresford, Richard Hooper, Eleni Spyreli and Khalid Saeed Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, BMJ Open, Maternal and Child Nutrition, BMC Public Health and BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact