Amanda Lim

762 citations
26 papers · 409 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 4
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 2
    • Eosinophilic Esophagitis 3
    • Esophageal and GI Pathology 2

Amanda Lim

21 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Amanda Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Gastroenterology 62
  • Genetics 157
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 9
  • Physiology 91
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 45
Replace C. Prinster with:
C. Prinster Italy
Marjorie M. Sutton United States
George Gershman United States
Anna Nilsson Sweden
James Markowitz United States
M. Ben Hariz Tunisia
Heinrich Kahles Germany
Tom Creed United Kingdom
Nancy Langhans United States
S. Mathur United States
Amanda Lim relative to C. Prinster Italy C. Prinster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.2×
C. Prinster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Lim. The network helps show where Amanda Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Lim Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015116
2 201861
3 201853
4 201446
5 201835
6 201518
7 202214
8 202113
9 201713
10 202111
11 20246
12 20075
13 20124
14 20243
15 20203
16 20222
17 20242
18 20131
19 20241
20 20121

About Amanda Lim

Amanda Lim is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology and Genetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (3 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (62 citations), Genetics (157 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (9 citations), Physiology (91 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (45 citations). Amanda Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane M. Andrews, Christopher G. Schultz, Charlotte Goess, Robert V. Bryant, Rachel Grafton, Nam Q. Nguyen, Andrew Vincent, Simon Travis, Samuel P. Costello and Scott Schoeman. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nutrients and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact