Amanda L. Hyde

1.0k citations
13 papers · 745 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda L. Hyde

13 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers

Amanda L. Hyde
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Applied Psychology 392
  • Social Psychology 249
  • Clinical Psychology 249
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
Replace Diane E. Whaley with:
Diane E. Whaley United States
Can Jiao China
Missy Peterson United States
Susan M. Bane United States
Rachel L. Bachrach United States
Daniel R. Czech United States
Karin Waldherr Austria
John F. Hunter United States
Desireé Ruiz-Aranda Spain
Corentin Clément-Guillotin France
Amanda L. Hyde relative to Diane E. Whaley United States Diane E. Whaley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Diane E. Whaley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda L. Hyde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda L. Hyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda L. Hyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda L. Hyde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda L. Hyde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda L. Hyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda L. Hyde. The network helps show where Amanda L. Hyde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Amanda L. Hyde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda L. Hyde Line = papers co-authored together Amanda L. Hyde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2013134
2 2010128
3 2012116
4 201268
5 201164
6 201152
7 201340
8 201339
9 201035
10 201235
11
Tethering theory to method: Using measures of intraindividual variability to operationalize individuals' dynamic characteristics.
201224
12 20129
13 20141

About Amanda L. Hyde

Amanda L. Hyde is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (392 citations), Social Psychology (249 citations), Clinical Psychology (249 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations). Amanda L. Hyde has collaborated with scholars based in United States, British Virgin Islands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include David E. Conroy, Shawna E. Doerksen, Steriani Elavsky, Nilàm Ram, Jaclyn P. Maher, Aaron L. Pincus, Nuno F. Ribeiro, Michael J. Roche, Lauren E. Molloy and Marı́a J. Martı́n. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Health Psychology, Psychology of sport and exercise, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and Journal of Research in Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact