Amanda Demeter

561 citations
10 papers · 219 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy 5
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 1

Amanda Demeter

10 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Amanda Demeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Epidemiology 103
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 18
  • Endocrinology 13
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
  • Physiology 9
Replace Jhen‐Wei Ruan with:
Jhen‐Wei Ruan Taiwan
Martin Lidén Sweden
Gokben Yildirir United States
Caio César Barbosa Bomfim Brazil
Yaqin Peng China
Yuchi Gao China
Anatol Sucher United States
Sarah Case Ireland
Roland Ndeh United States
Amanda Demeter relative to Jhen‐Wei Ruan Taiwan Jhen‐Wei Ruan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Jhen‐Wei Ruan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Demeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Demeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Demeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Demeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Demeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Demeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Demeter. The network helps show where Amanda Demeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Demeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Demeter Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Demeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201578
2 201935
3 202035
4 202028
5 201721
6 20219
7 20235
8 20164
9 20223
10 20211

About Amanda Demeter

Amanda Demeter is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (5 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (1 paper) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (103 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (18 citations), Endocrinology (13 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations) and Physiology (9 citations). Amanda Demeter has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tamás Korcsmáros, Padhmanand Sudhakar, Dávid Fazekas, Tibor Vellai, Katalin Lenti, Dezső Módos, Dénes Türei, Márton Ölbei, László Földvári-Nagy and Péter Csermely. Their work appears in journals such as Autophagy, Biomedicines, Scientific Reports, Zebrafish and npj Systems Biology and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact