Amanda Croft
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Global Health Workforce Issues
Papers in
-
- Cell death mechanisms and regulation 7
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 4
- RNA regulation and disease 4
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research 4
- PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer 3
- Oncology 7
- Co-authors
- Xu Dong Zhang (17 shared papers)Chen Chen Jiang (14 shared papers)Peter Hersey (9 shared papers)Lei Jin (10 shared papers)Kwang Hong Tay (5 shared papers)Hsin‐Yi Tseng (6 shared papers)Su Guo (8 shared papers)Fan Yang (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology (3 papers)Oncogene (2 papers)Cancer Research (2 papers)Cell Death and Disease (2 papers)Molecular Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda Croft
35 papers receiving 913 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cell Biology 200
- Emergency Medical Services 50
- Molecular Biology 535
- Oncology 183
- Cancer Research 101
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Croft
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Croft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Croft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Croft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Croft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Croft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Croft. The network helps show where Amanda Croft may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Croft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 10 |
About Amanda Croft
Amanda Croft is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Cell Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cell death mechanisms and regulation (7 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (6 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (4 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers), RNA regulation and disease (4 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (4 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (4 papers) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (200 citations), Emergency Medical Services (50 citations), Molecular Biology (535 citations), Oncology (183 citations) and Cancer Research (101 citations). Amanda Croft has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Xu Dong Zhang, Chen Chen Jiang, Peter Hersey, Lei Jin, Kwang Hong Tay, Hsin‐Yi Tseng, Su Guo, Fan Yang, Fritz Lai and Helen Rizos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Oncogene, Cancer Research, Cell Death and Disease and Molecular Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.