Amanda Clune

452 citations
16 papers · 376 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Clune

16 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Amanda Clune
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 215
  • Materials Chemistry 307
  • Condensed Matter Physics 75
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 72
  • Inorganic Chemistry 26
Replace Michael O. Yokosuk with:
Michael O. Yokosuk United States
Jinho Yang South Korea
G. Monney Switzerland
Paul Nahai-Williamson United Kingdom
B. Hildebrand Switzerland
G. A. de la Peña United States
Roman Dubrovin Russia
Selene Mor Italy
Kwing To Lai Hong Kong
R. Sopracase France
Amanda Clune relative to Michael O. Yokosuk United States Michael O. Yokosuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Michael O. Yokosuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Clune

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Clune's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Clune with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Clune more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Clune

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Clune. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Clune. The network helps show where Amanda Clune may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Clune, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Clune Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Clune links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015221
2 201722
3 202019
4 201816
5 201715
6 202214
7 201912
8 202112
9 202012
10 20188
11 20188
12 20217
13 20224
14 20174
15 20241
16
Realization of the orbital-selective Mott state at the molecular level in Ba3LaRu2O9
20211

About Amanda Clune

Amanda Clune is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Geophysics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (9 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (8 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (6 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (6 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (3 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (3 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (2 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (215 citations), Materials Chemistry (307 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (75 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (72 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (26 citations). Amanda Clune has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Janice L. Musfeldt, Michael O. Yokosuk, Jiaqiang Yan, David Mandrus, Richard G. Hennig, Travis J. Williams, Brian C. Sales, Laura D. Casto-Boggess, Houlong L. Zhuang and Ming‐Wei Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Inorganic Chemistry, npj 2D Materials and Applications, npj Quantum Materials and APL Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact