Amanda Blatch-Jones
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 3
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
-
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 1
- Co-authors
- Emma Kirkpatrick (1 shared paper)James Raftery (4 shared papers)Trisha Greenhalgh (3 shared papers)Matthew Glover (3 shared papers)Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo (6 shared papers)Stephen Hanney (2 shared papers)Kathryn Fackrell (6 shared papers)Katie Meadmore (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- F1000Research (5 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)Trials (2 papers)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda Blatch-Jones
17 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 32
- General Health Professions 60
- Health Informatics 3
- Information Systems and Management 15
- Economics and Econometrics 37
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Blatch-Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Blatch-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Blatch-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Blatch-Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Blatch-Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. The network helps show where Amanda Blatch-Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Blatch-Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 10 | Updated systematic review | 2016 | 5 |
| 11 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 0 |
About Amanda Blatch-Jones
Amanda Blatch-Jones is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Health Informatics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations), General Health Professions (60 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Information Systems and Management (15 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (37 citations). Amanda Blatch-Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emma Kirkpatrick, James Raftery, Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Glover, Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Stephen Hanney, Kathryn Fackrell, Katie Meadmore, Abby Bull and Simon Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as F1000Research, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Trials and Health Technology Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.