Amanda Blatch-Jones

726 citations
19 papers · 276 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Blatch-Jones

17 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Amanda Blatch-Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 32
  • General Health Professions 60
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Information Systems and Management 15
  • Economics and Econometrics 37
Replace Philippe Amiel with:
Philippe Amiel France
Barbara Nail‐Chiwetalu United States
Sandra Walsh Australia
Heather Cunningham Canada
Holly Meyer United States
Sarah Viehbeck Canada
Elise McPherson Australia
Myriam Patricia Cifuentes United States
Barbara Chamberlain United States
Joseph A. Costello United States
Amanda Blatch-Jones relative to Philippe Amiel France Philippe Amiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philippe Amiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Blatch-Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Blatch-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Blatch-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Blatch-Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Blatch-Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. The network helps show where Amanda Blatch-Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Blatch-Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Blatch-Jones Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Blatch-Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201884
2 201660
3 202034
4 201733
5 202220
6 201810
7 20208
8 20238
9 20236
10
Updated systematic review
20165
11 20232
12 20211
13 20241
14 20231
15 20251
16 20241
17 20231
18 20190
19 20240

About Amanda Blatch-Jones

Amanda Blatch-Jones is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Health Informatics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations), General Health Professions (60 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Information Systems and Management (15 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (37 citations). Amanda Blatch-Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emma Kirkpatrick, James Raftery, Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Glover, Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Stephen Hanney, Kathryn Fackrell, Katie Meadmore, Abby Bull and Simon Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as F1000Research, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Trials and Health Technology Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact