Allison Schaefer

31 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Allison Schaefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Instrumentation 32
  • Aerospace Engineering 207
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 49
  • Atmospheric Science 79
  • Bioengineering 16
Replace Ingmar Müller with:
Ingmar Müller Germany
K D Stock Germany
Thor-Erik Hansen Norway
Timothy M. Jung United States
G. Cheymol France
Chris D. Maxey United Kingdom
Randal L. Schmitt United States
K. H. Kang South Korea
Brian G. Rodricks United States
Frank R. Arams United States
Allison Schaefer relative to Ingmar Müller Germany Ingmar Müller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ingmar Müller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Schaefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Schaefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Schaefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Schaefer. The network helps show where Allison Schaefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Schaefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison Schaefer Line = papers co-authored together Allison Schaefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980101
2 198358
3 198140
4 201024
5 199019
6 198418
7 200614
8 200911
9 197910
10 198210
11 19849
12 20027
13 19867
14 19776
15 19976
16 19846
17 19885
18 19794
19 19894
20
Application of PN and avalanche silicon photodiodes to low-level optical radiation measurements.
19883

About Allison Schaefer

Allison Schaefer is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering and Radiation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (14 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (8 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (6 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (6 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (32 citations), Aerospace Engineering (207 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (49 citations), Atmospheric Science (79 citations) and Bioengineering (16 citations). Allison Schaefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jon Geist, Edward F. Zalewski, Newton Kara-Júnior, Kenneth L. Eckerle, Junfeng Song, Georg Boeck, Wilson Takashi Hida, Paulo E.C. Dantas, Robert D. Saunders and George P. Eppeldauer. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Neuromuscular Disorders, International journal of exercise science and Metrologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact