Kenneth L. Eckerle

24 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Kenneth L. Eckerle
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 44
  • Aerospace Engineering 129
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
  • Analytical Chemistry 19
  • Instrumentation 4
Replace John V. Prodan with:
John V. Prodan United States
Albert R. Filippelli United States
V. A. Maı̆danov Ukraine
Andreas Steiger Germany
S. S. Hong South Korea
O. P. Shatalov Russia
Wilhelm Walcher Germany
Paul V. Marrone United States
Jae Gang Kim South Korea
P. Cérez France
Kenneth L. Eckerle relative to John V. Prodan United States John V. Prodan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
John V. Prodan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth L. Eckerle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth L. Eckerle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth L. Eckerle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth L. Eckerle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth L. Eckerle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth L. Eckerle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth L. Eckerle. The network helps show where Kenneth L. Eckerle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth L. Eckerle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth L. Eckerle Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth L. Eckerle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197265
2 196732
3 197331
4 197625
5 200223
6 196619
7 198514
8 198613
9 196712
10 201312
11 19649
12 19849
13 19726
14 19896
15 19775
16 19805
17 19864
18 19853
19 19752
20 19822

About Kenneth L. Eckerle

Kenneth L. Eckerle is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 27 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (18 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (12 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Advanced optical system design (3 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers) and Optical Coatings and Gratings (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (44 citations), Aerospace Engineering (129 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (107 citations), Analytical Chemistry (19 citations) and Instrumentation (4 citations). Kenneth L. Eckerle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Klaus D. Mielenz, James R. Roberts, Victor R. Weidner, K.D. Mielenz, R. W. P. McWhirter, Joseph Reader, Robert P. Madden, Edward A. Early, A. R. Schaefer and Jack J. Hsia. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Color Research & Application, Metrologia, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact