Jon Geist

110 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jon Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Instrumentation 105
  • Aerospace Engineering 702
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 164
  • Bioengineering 108
  • Biomedical Engineering 770
Replace Philip E. Ciddor with:
Philip E. Ciddor Australia
Eustace L. Dereniak United States
Maria Luisa Rastello Italy
M. Kitamura Japan
Xinbin Cheng China
Donald R. Herriott United States
Michael E. Gehm United States
Hendrik Paul Urbach Netherlands
Hans M. Melchior Switzerland
James E. Harvey United States
Jon Geist relative to Philip E. Ciddor Australia Philip E. Ciddor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Philip E. Ciddor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Geist. The network helps show where Jon Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Geist Line = papers co-authored together Jon Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980126
2 1987121
3 1980101
4 200982
5 199178
6 197473
7 200772
8 199767
9 198760
10 198358
11 200655
12 200653
13 198347
14 197942
15 197342
16 198140
17 198035
18 198934
19 201033
20 198830

About Jon Geist

Jon Geist is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (27 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (13 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (12 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (12 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (12 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (10 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (9 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (105 citations), Aerospace Engineering (702 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (164 citations), Bioengineering (108 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (770 citations). Jon Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Edward F. Zalewski, Michael Gaitan, Raj S. Korde, Allison Schaefer, W. R. Blevin, Mulpuri V. Rao, Samuel M. Stavis, Henry P. Baltes, Laurie E. Locascio and Alexander M. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Journal of Applied Physics, Metrologia and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact