Alison E. Denham

40 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Alison E. Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 85
  • Developmental Biology 15
  • Pharmacology 41
  • Social Psychology 41
  • Oncology 43
Replace Katja Boehm with:
Katja Boehm Germany
Min Ying Niu China
Mohammad Mahdi Parvizi Iran
Ricardo Ghelman Brazil
Joseph J. Hoffman United States
Luilma Albuquerque Gurgel Brazil
Barbara Stöckigt Germany
Jialing Sun China
Stephanie N. Salazar United States
Alison E. Denham relative to Katja Boehm Germany Katja Boehm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Katja Boehm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison E. Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison E. Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison E. Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison E. Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison E. Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison E. Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison E. Denham. The network helps show where Alison E. Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Alison E. Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison E. Denham Line = papers co-authored together Alison E. Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200270
2 199860
3 201048
4 200231
5 200730
6 20008
7 20177
8 20016
9 20106
10 20106
11 20245
12
The Western Herbal Tradition
20105
13 20115
14 20104
15 20104
16 20104
17
Plato on Art and Beauty
20123
18 20173
19 20103
20 20103

About Alison E. Denham

Alison E. Denham is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Philosophy, Food Science, Pharmacology and Plant Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (4 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (85 citations), Developmental Biology (15 citations), Pharmacology (41 citations), Social Psychology (41 citations) and Oncology (43 citations). Alison E. Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael McIntyre, Julie M. Whitehouse, Julia Green, Michael J. Schell, J A Earp, Etta D. Pisano, R. J. GREENWOOD, Volker Sommer, Jenny C Ingram and Rosemary Greenwood. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Music and Letters, Radiology, Animal Behaviour and Modern fiction studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact